House Republicans, eyeing the majority, experience growing pains despite presenting a united front
House Republicans, confident they will win back the House in the midterm elections, are laying the ground work for the first Republican majority since Democrats took back the majority in 2019. But even in these early stages, familiar factions are emerging, reminding GOP leadership of their limitations and their challenges ahead.
The Post’s Marianna Sotomayor and Leigh Ann dig deep into the undercurrent of tension within the party. Here are some highlights:
- The GOP conference is unveiling today their “Commitment to America” pledgea one-page memo of principles that GOP leaders hope will both convince voters to hand them control of House as well serve as the guiding touchstone that holds the group together when legislative divisions inevitably emerge.
The proposals are thin on actual policy prescriptions to the problems House Republicans want to solve. Aides say that’s on purpose.
- “The difficult thing with being too specific is that you wade into some of the nuances of policy and [it] has to be broad so that everybody can kind of find their niche,” said Rep. Stephanie I. Bice (R-Okla.), who helped to craft the plan.
As the party tries to publicly unite around the document, members on the right flank are sharpening their ultimatums behind the scenes. The House Freedom Caucus is expected to make starker demands of leadership in exchange for their votes, in particular a request to bring back a rule that gives members the ability to recall the speaker at any time — a direct threat should House Minority Leader Kevin McCarthy (R-Calif.) take the gavel.
- “Based on everything that I hear interacting with the American people, leadership of a Republican majority better be prepared to make change,” said Rep. Dan Bishop (R-N.C.), a Freedom Caucus member.
The impending battle over the focus and strategy of a Republican majority is expected to escalate in leadership races in the coming weeks with McCarthy at the center. Who his lieutenants are will set the stage for the direction of how the party governs in the next Congress.
- While some of the candidates have been quietly campaigning for months, the race for whip began in earnest this month after Rep. Elise Stefanik (R-N.Y.) announced she wasn’t going to run. Each of the three candidates — Reps. Tom Emmer (R-Minn.), Jim Banks (R-Ind.) and Drew Ferguson (R-Ga.) — represent different ideological factions within the party.
The Freedom Caucus is pushing to ensure they have more representation in the conference, multiple Republican aides and lawmakers said. That means positions on key committees, including the House Permanent Select Committee on Intelligence and the Republican Steering Committee — neither of which have representation from the Freedom Caucus. And conservative members are making clear they will be anything but easy for leaders to manage.
- “God bless the person who will do it and a special blessing to the person who has to whip me,” Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) said.
Ukraine’s prosecutor general is building a criminal case against Russia
Seven questions for … Andriy Kostin: We sat down with Ukraine’s new prosecutor general while he was in Washington this week to discuss his efforts to prosecute potential Russian war crimes, his work with the Justice Department and his push to create an international tribunal to hold Russia accountable. This interview has been edited and condensed for lengthy and clarity.
The Early: What brings you to Washington? Who are you meeting with while you’re here?
The advantages: Meetings with DOJ, with the House and Senate and some other institutions to assist not only in the investigation of war crimes, but in making Russia accountable for what they did in Ukraine. [We’re seeking] international support for the creation of a special tribunal — to [hold] the highest [Russian] political and military leadership responsible not only for aggression, which is [the] mother of all crimes, but for other crimes committed in Ukraine: war crimes, crimes against humanity and genocide.
We also call on the U.S. and our other friends and allies [to support] the creation of a special compensation mechanism — [for] all of the funds of the Russian Federation and Russian oligarchs which are already seized and frozen in many countries to be confiscated and then transferred to Ukraine to compensate the damage caused by Russian aggression.
The Early: When Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky appointed you in July, he said your top task would be “to bring to justice all Russian war criminals who came to our land.” What are your top priorities when it comes to prosecuting potential war crimes?
The advantages: The most important priority is to investigate the cases of mass atrocities. We saw people killed, raped, tortured in Bucha and Irpin, and now we see the same in Izyum. We understand that these cases show a pattern of Russian ideology towards Ukraine, and there is one more link to potential genocide. It seems that wherever Russian aggression comes, it turns this place into a new Bucha, a new Izyum.
The sooner we liberate these territories, the sooner people will get justice and security. It’s also important because we are capturing a lot of, let’s say, prisoners of war slash war criminals of [the] Russian Federation. Among them we can find officers, even high-ranking officers, which could be then put on trial in Ukraine, maybe even on the international level.
The Early: Are you saying one of the aims of Ukraine’s counteroffensive is to capture Russian officers so that they can then be prosecuted?
The advantages: It’s not the aim, but we understand that this will happen. If we are talking about making the Russians liable on the level of the Ukrainian judicial system and on the international level with the [International Criminal Court] and [before a] tribunal, then we need more people to be captured — more war criminals to be captured [and] in our possession. Of course, we also have trials in absentia. But it’s much more important to have a real person on the bench.
The Early: How has what has been discovered in Izyum changed your thinking about how to approach these prosecutions?
The advantages: After Bucha, Irpin and other mass atrocities [uncovered] near Kyiv, we have experience. Now our work is more productive, it’s done in a more speedy manner, and it’s more organized. We have joint investigative groups, [comprised of] police officers, the prosecutor, the representative of the state security service and experts. The same groups are also dealing with collaborators, because there are a lot of people who helped the Russians on occupied territory.
The Early: After meeting with your predecessor in June, Attorney General Merrick Garland directed Eli Rosenbaum to create a war crimes accountability team at the Justice Department. Have you been working with Rosenbaum’s team?
The advantages: Yes. We meet online, and we will have [a] meeting in person with him and his team here. All of our projects of cooperation are ongoing and in a very active phase, starting [with the] task force, which is dealing with seizing and freezing of Russian assets.
The Early: Zelensky removed the previous prosecutor general, Iryna Venediktovafor not moving more aggressively to go after suspected collaborators. What are you doing differently?
The advantages: One of my first decisions [was] to start [an] internal investigation. We have a special department within the prosecutor general’s office, which is responsible for internal security. It will take some time. I hope it will [take] two months, and then we will come back with some conclusions.
The Early: You mentioned that you’d like to see a special tribunal to investigate potential war crimes. What would that look like? Can you walk me through how it would work?
The advantages: There [are] different legal frameworks, and we try all of them. [The] first is [a] tribunal under the umbrella of or organized by an international institution. It could be the U.N. The second option is [an] ad hoc tribunal.
The International Criminal Court has no jurisdiction for the crime of aggression, so the only possibility to punish the highest military and political leadership is [a] tribunal. If we all understand that Russia committed aggression, if we all understand that this aggression [violated] international law, then we can’t leave the crime of aggression unpunished. We need even now for everything to be prepared for this tribunal — for the crime of aggression to be investigated, prosecuted, and punished.
Trump 🤝 QAnon: Music “widely described as an anthem for QAnon,” which features “swelling strings, gentle bell tones and brooding piano harmonies,” closed former president Donald Trump’s two-hour speech at a rally in Youngstown, Ohio, last Saturday, our colleagues Isaac Arnsdorf, Josh Dawsey and Michael Scherer report. The song’s journey from Trump to QAnon back to Trump underscores “the increasing difficulty in parsing distinctions between the QAnon following and Trump’s own ‘Make America Great Again’ movement.”
The song was initially the soundtrack of a video Trump released in August and “followers interpreted Trump’s use of the song as a message meant for them. ‘If that’s not a Q proof then I don’t know what is,’ one influencer with more than 200,000 subscribers wrote on the encrypted messaging platform Telegram.”
- “Trump has winked at QAnon before, including by retweeting content from QAnon-supporting accounts while he was president. Those gestures tended to increase at times when Trump was under attack, such as during one of his two impeachments … He recently promoted an image on his Truth Social platform showing him wearing a Q lapel pin with the movement slogans: “The storm is coming” and “WWG1WGA.”
- When the song was played at last Saturday’s rally, the crowd responded by raising their arms and pointing their index fingers, our colleagues write. “The raised hands caught the attention of rally organizers, who began asking people in the crowd what was happening … Some aides figured the raised hands were people praying like they were in church.”
- Happening today: Trump will hold a rally in Wilmington, N.C. Since the rally bookends a tumultuous week for Trump, “he will likely use the song again.”
Rocket Man – aka Sir Elton John – will perform at the White House today. The concert, titled, “A Night When Hope and History Rhyme,” will “celebrate the unifying and healing power of music, commend the life and work of Sir Elton John, and honor the everyday history-makers in the audience,” per a statement from the White House.
John’s performance on the South Lawn today is yet another indication that celebrities are making a beeline for the White House after a four-year-long absence under the Trump administration. John’s White House invitation follows Olivia Rodrigo’s and BTS’s. Which celebrity do you think we’ll see next at the White House?
That’s like eating a hamburger without the burger….